↓

Certain Doubts

devoted to matters epistemic

Certain Doubts
Home Menu ↓
Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Decade and Longitudinal Journal Information
  • Epistemology Course Slides
  • Talks: Slides and Videos
  • About Certain Doubts
  • Contributors
  • Archives
  • Complete Hirsch Number Rankings of U.S. Philosophy PhD Programs
  • Philosophy Journal Information: ESF Rankings, Citation Impact, & Rejection Rates
  • Some of Our Books

Monthly Archives: February 2005

Post navigation

← Older posts

Defeasible Consequences

Posted on February 28, 2005 by Kvanvig Jon
44

Let S be a set of beliefs and experiences that is the evidence on which we are going to apply defeasible reasoning. Then suppose we have propositions p1…pn with the following properties: 1. S |~ p1 (p1 is a defeasible … Continue reading →

Posted in justification | 44 Replies

Epistemic constraints on Jeffrey conditioning

Posted on February 26, 2005 by mcgrew
3

Literature question: is there anything out there about epistemic constraints on, or an epistemic rationale for, the use of Jeffrey conditioning? Dick Jeffrey was, himself, a radical personalist, so he had little to say about the conditions under which it … Continue reading →

Posted in confirmation theory | 3 Replies

Welcome to formal epistemologists

Posted on February 24, 2005 by Kvanvig Jon
12

One of my interests is to see greater interaction between traditional approaches to epistemology and more formal approaches to epistemology, including Bayesian epistemology, confirmation theory, learning theory, and whatever other stuff is done by the really neat group of contributors … Continue reading →

Posted in general | 12 Replies

On Commenting Delays

Posted on February 22, 2005 by Kvanvig Jon
4

This is in response to Ralph’s post just below, and I’m putting it here in hopes that more people will see it. I’ve put in controls to keep spammers out, and the controls often kick in on ordinary comments. When … Continue reading →

Posted in general | 4 Replies

Problems posting comments on Certain Doubts

Posted on February 22, 2005 by Ralph Wedgwood
Reply

I tried posting a long reply to Ram as a comment on the last thread, but somehow, my attempt to post the comment seems not to have worked, and I lost my comment in the process as well. Jon, could … Continue reading →

Posted in general | Leave a reply

Neta’s “An Internalist Refutation of Fallibilism”

Posted on February 18, 2005 by Kvanvig Jon
18

Ram just sent me a work-in-progress entitled “An Internalist Refutation of Fallibilism”. The thesis is provocative: if internalism is true, then fallibilism is false. Comments welcome! … Continue reading →

Posted in internalism and externalism | 18 Replies

“Contemporary Debates” now out

Posted on February 15, 2005 by Kvanvig Jon
Reply

I just got my copy of Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, edited by Steup and Sosa. It looks great! Here’s the Blackwell’s link and here’s the Amazon link. … Continue reading →

Posted in general | Leave a reply

How useful is a logic for Defeasible / Nonmonotonic Conditionals for Epistemology?

Posted on February 14, 2005 by hawthorne
33

The posting “Jim Hawthorne on the Logic of Nonmonotonic Conditionals” took a rather technical turn (which was my fault–sorry!!!). This posting is addressed to readers of the blog more generally. In it I will describe much about defeasible conditionals that … Continue reading →

Posted in general | 33 Replies

New Book by Harry Frankfurt

Posted on February 12, 2005 by cling
1

Harry Frankfurt has just published On Bullshit with Princeton University Press. An excerpt and links to the paper on which it was based and an interview with Frankfurt on “Marketplace” can be found here. I found the essay upon which … Continue reading →

Posted in general | 1 Reply

Conditional Fallacy Stuff

Posted on February 12, 2005 by Kvanvig Jon
4

A word of caution: it will be very hard to find a conception of epistemology on which this post counts as that. It’s on the conditional fallacy, but the context of discussion is the nature of dispositions. So I’m going … Continue reading →

Posted in general | 4 Replies

Post navigation

← Older posts
© 2013 - Certain Doubts Proudly powered by WordPress  Weaver II by WP Weaver
↑